Mr. Canellos is the author of the forthcoming book “Revenge for the Sixties: Sam Alito and the Triumph of the Conservative ...

Deadline: White House” legal analyst Jordan Rubin answers your questions about the Supreme Court, Trump administration lawsuits and more.

Shannon Bream's new book "Nothing is Impossible with God" debuted at No. 1 on the New York Times bestseller list, making it ...

According to President Donald Trump, two of the three justices that he himself appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court are "an embarrassment to their families" because they voted against him in the recent ...

Samuel Alito '72 was sworn in as the 110th justice of the Supreme Court after being confirmed by the Senate today in a vote of 58 to 42. Alito, the ninth alumnus to hold a seat on the high court and ...

President Trump is likely to make less of an impact on the federal bench in his second term because of fewer vacancies, a ...

Rumors have swirled that conservative Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito may be planning to retire in October, and while such a move would likely secure the lifelong appointment of another ...

For the court’s conservatives, the only consistency is their inconsistency. Still, things rather conspicuously keep going the GOP’s way. In the old days, it used to require actual work to show that ...

The expected release date of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s new book has led legal experts to speculate that he might have plans to retire this year. Alito’s book, So Ordered: An ...

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito did not participate in the court's decision not to hear a case involving “forever chemicals,” according to a court order list released on Monday. The order in ...

Over the past weeks, there has been much discussion — both in the Senate and the media — about the meaning of Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito '72's membership in a group called the Concerned Alumni ...

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily. The court’s ruling sets a disturbing precedent for voting rights in several ways.