The Supreme Court can still invalidate the newest national injunction and allow the order to go into effect anywhere it is ...

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United ...

CONCORD, N.H. — Immigrants rights’ advocates today filed a new nationwide class-action lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship. The lawsuit is ...

However, the justices did not decide whether President Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship is lawful. The ...

There is local reaction to Friday's landmark ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court.There are two parts to the ruling: The overall ...

The 6-3 ruling changed the status quo on universal injunctions, limiting the power of lower-level courts to issue injunctions ...

Within two hours of a Supreme Court ruling that limits the ability of federal courts to impose universal injunctions, lawyers ...

Immigrant support group SIREN reminded community members that while birthright citizenship may have triggered Friday's ruling, the court didn’t rule on birthright citizenship.

The Maryland plaintiffs in a case that reached the U.S. Supreme Court called Friday a sad and confusing day after the high court released its ruling.

The divided court ruled that individual judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions but left open the possibility that the birthright citizenship changes could remain blocked nationwide.

Republican Rep. Andy Barr of Kentucky is introducing a bill to end birthright citizenship amid an ongoing legal battle between President Trump and several Democratic states.

The case revolved around the Trump administration’s challenge against multiple nationwide injunctions against the president’s Day One order to end birthright citizenship.